Laboratory for Surface Modification (LSM)

Seminars Archives

January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008

Thursday, February 07, 2008
IAMDN-No Seminar
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Examining the fractional quantum Hall effect in nanostructures: towards confining non-Abelian quantum Hall states
Michael Manfra
Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
12:00pm, Chem 260

Semiconductor heterostructures form the basis for many of our modern technologies, ranging from high-speed transistors to the laser diode. They also provide an ideal playground for exploring the physics of strongly interacting electrons in two dimensions. When a perpendicular magnetic field is applied to a two-dimensional electron gas, the electronic density of states is transformed into a series of discrete, highly degenerate, states known as Landau levels (LL). At high fields, all of the electrons can be accommodated within a single LL known as the lowest (N=0) LL. Within the lowest LL, transport is dominated by the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE). At lower magnetic fields where more than one LL is occupied, physics is much more complicated. In this regime, novel FQHE states compete with other correlated, but inhomogeneous, ground states, producing some spectacular transport signatures at low temperatures. In this talk I will detail our experimental efforts to confine several exotic FQHE states in the 2nd LL in micron scale geometries. The quasiparticles of some of these states are believed to obey non-Abelian statistics. Small scale devices in which the non-Abelian FQHE states’ quasiparticles can be manipulated may someday provide a platform for quantum computation.
Friday, February 15, 2008
Twenty-Second Annual Symposium of the Laboratory for Surface Modification honoring David C. Langreth and Ted E. Madey
The symposium will begin at 9:00am in the Fiber Optics Auditorium, Busch Campus Piscataway, New Jersey.

Click here for Symposium Program (PDF file)


Highlight Presentations
Ulrike Diebold, Department of Physics, Tulane University
Kalman Pelhos, Seagate Technologies
John Perdew, Department of Physics, Tulane University
Zhenyu Zhang, Oak Ridge National Lab

Prizes of $150 each for two Best Student Posters
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Growth Strategies for Oxide Heteroepitaxy on Silicon by ALD
Prof. Brian G. Willis
Chemical Engineering
University of Delaware
12:00 PM
Room 260, Wright-Rieman Chemistry Laboratory

Abstract: For the past several decades, the semiconductor industry has grown by doubling the transistor density on a silicon chip roughly every two years (Moore’s Law). We are now in the era of one billion transistors on a single chip, and there is growing uncertainty about the feasibility and practicality of continuing the miniaturization much beyond the 22 nm node, which is only a few years into the future. As the exponential scaling declines, there is a growing interest to integrate new materials with new functionalities in order to extend innovation in semiconductor technology. One promising avenue is to integrate complex oxides with silicon devices through the heteroepitaxy of crystalline oxides on semiconductors. The integration of crystalline oxides with semiconductors may enable new device structures that harness the useful functional properties of oxide materials. These useful properties include ferroelectricity, pyroelectricity, piezoelectricity, and many others. In addition, the crystalline oxides are of interest for applications as high-k dielectrics for transistor or memory devices. The integration of oxides with semiconductors is a challenging materials engineering problem due to the differences in crystal structure and properties between the covalent bonded semiconductor and the ionic bonded oxide layer. Presently, the successful heteroepitaxy of crystalline oxides on semiconductors has only been achieved using molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). While MBE methods have advantages in terms of the precise control of the growth process, their disadvantages include high capital and operating costs, and growth rates are considerably lower than standard manufacturing practice. A more cost effective method to grow epitaxial oxides would be a significant advance for the practical implementation of these useful materials.

This talk will present research strategies for the use of metal-organic compounds to grow crystalline oxides using chemical vapor deposition or atomic layer deposition. The critical objectives are to control the composition and structure over an interface layer that is less than 1 nanometer thick. Using surface chemistry methods including ultra-high vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy along with Hafnium and Strontium compounds as model systems, we present several strategies for a chemical engineering approach to oxide heteroepitaxy. It will be shown that direct reaction of the common β-diketonate precursors with the semiconductor surface is unlikely to be a successful strategy due to adverse surface reactions of the organic components associated with these compounds. A second approach is to use a water-templated Si(100)-2x1 surface to form an atomically abrupt semiconductor/metal-oxide interface. It is shown that atomically abrupt interfaces are achieved, but forming an ordered two dimensional surface requires a more detailed understanding of the adsorption kinetics of H2O(g). Lastly, it is shown that the most promising approach is to use alkaline earth metal-oxide layers grown by ALD with a catalytic oxide desorption step. It will be demonstrated that the results are comparable to MBE data and that the metal-organic surface reaction approach is a promising alternative to MBE for the growth of crystalline oxides.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Surface modification for improved organic electronic devices
Prof. Steven L. Bernasek
Dept. of Chemistry, Princeton University
12:00 PM
Room 260, Wright-Rieman Chemistry Laboratory

Abstract: Charge injection barriers occur at interfaces in hybrid electronic devices such as organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) and organic thin film transistors (OTFTs). Modification of the interfaces can be used to control charge transport in the device. Surface dipole manipulation is one route to control this charge injection barrier. Another is to prepare strongly attached doped layers at the interface via appropriate self-assembly routes. We describe methods of surface functionalization that allow the realization of this barrier control on indium tin oxide surfaces used in OLED devices. These routes focus on ligand exchange chemistry or phosphonate self-assembled monolayer formation followed by carrier doping, and result in considerably improved OLED performance. Similar methods are used to fashion improved thin film transistor devices on silicon substrates, and examples of this approach are discussed. Characterization of the monolayer interfaces formed, and the device performance based on them are presented.

You may also view a summary of past and upcoming seminars.